Environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing has become a hotly debated trend in the financial sector. While some see ESG factors as an important consideration, others argue that these norms are politically motivated and hinder returns. Financial advisors say personal values like ESG can guide a viable investment strategy. However, he says, investors focused on maximizing returns may also want to consider other factors, such as the high expense ratios charged on many ESG funds, and not limit themselves to just those investment sectors. that score relatively well on ESG.
A financial advisor can help you build a retirement portfolio tailored to both your financial objectives and personal values. Talk to an advisor today.
ESG investing incorporates environmental, social and governance factors into investment analysis and decisions. For example, ESG criteria may include metrics such as a company’s carbon emissions, board diversity, executive compensation, and other non-financial elements that are not traditionally considered in investment analysis.
The concept of ESG investing first emerged in 2005 when the United Nations endorsed the creation of the Principles for Responsible Investment, a framework for incorporating ESG issues into the analysis. However, ESG didn’t gain major momentum until 2017 when large companies like S&P Global began formally integrating these factors into their credit rating models.
Fund managers also started launching dedicated ESG mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs), allocating capital to companies with high ESG scores. Proponents argued that this would encourage companies to adopt more sustainable practices by linking ESG performance to access to capital.
The ESG bond market is set to exceed $6 trillion by 2023 as both corporations and governments issue tagged bonds to finance eco-friendly projects. Some companies also receive a “greenium” or price advantage by issuing bonds designated as ESG-compliant. However, this value advantage has generally evaporated due to the recent political backlash against ESG investment standards.
After years of rapid growth in ESG investing, political scrutiny of the practice began to come into prominence beginning in 2022. Critics describe ESG investing as primarily driven by political concerns and potential pressure on returns.
Additionally, some critics have raised concerns about the complexity and reliability of ESG metrics. But much of the backlash is driven by the notion that ESG norms are biased towards certain industries, such as oil and gas. Critics argue that fund managers are prioritizing political goals rather than generating returns.
Many states have imposed restrictions limiting how state pension funds can incorporate ESG factors into investments. States have also threatened to withhold assets from some investment managers who support ESG investments.
This push-and-pull has had a profound impact on the markets. In August 2022, S&P Global completely stopped including ESG scores in its credit rating methodology in response to investor backlash. The SEC has also announced plans to tighten climate disclosure requirements, which some associate with ESG.
According to Morningstar research, investor flows into dedicated ESG mutual funds and ETFs have declined significantly since mid-2022. Companies are proceeding more cautiously with ESG-aligned bonds as well.
What does this mean for investors
For individual investors, the rapid emergence and subsequent backlash of ESG investing raises important issues. On the one hand, limiting ESG considerations may allow for greater investment in certain sectors such as oil and gas, potentially boosting diversification and returns. On the other hand, many investors legitimately want to invest in businesses that support their core values.
for Brandon Renfro, A certified financial planner and financial advisor in Longview, Texas, employing ESG to guide investment decisions isn’t necessarily negative, but more about personal values than a matter of tech investing. “Investments selected on the ESG score alone may underperform or outperform a given benchmark over a given period of time, which is true for any type of investment selected based on any other selection criteria,” he added.
Lorraine Z. Montaney, certified financial planner and senior retirement planning advisor at DBR & Company in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, says ESG funds often have high expense ratios and may not outperform other investments over the long term. She suggests an alternative to employing a strict interpretation of ESG investing as the sole guide in building a portfolio.
She adds, “Our advice to investors who want to make money while investing according to their values is to look deeper than a fund’s ESG score, as the definition of ESG investing is largely political with little or no No inspection.” “Instead, we would encourage investors to make sure that management/investors’ values are in line with yours, whether you choose to invest in individual companies or through other managers.”
For retirement investors, the ESG debate introduces another layer of complexity into portfolio construction and fund selection. As ESG-compliant investments have lost some of their value after attracting criticism, the weaknesses of ESG investing such as high fees and limited options have come into greater focus. It looks like ESG may be regressing from being the sole determinant of an investment’s value to one of many factors including financial fundamentals as well as other personal values.
Questions about our study? Contact [email protected].
Photo credit: ©iStock/Pogonici